Whittier College Policy on Academic Integrity
Use of Artificial Intelligence – Submitting work that has been generated, even if only in part, by Artificial Intelligence tools constitutes academic dishonesty and is expressly forbidden without prior and explicit permission from an instructor.
See Definition 5. on Whittier College’s Policies and Procedures on Academic Honesty
AI in the Classroom: Slides from Faculty Retreat 2024
Direct Link to Slides: AI in the Classroom
Sample Syllabi Statements
Below is sample language you may adopt for your own policy. Feel free to modify it or create your own to suit the needs of your course.
A maximally restrictive draft policy:
We expect that all work students submit for this course will be their own. In instances when collaborative work is assigned, we expect for the assignment to list all team members who participated. We specifically forbid the use of ChatGPT or any other generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools at all stages of the work process, including preliminary ones. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Whittier College could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course.
A fully-encouraging draft policy:
This course encourages students to explore the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools such as ChatGPT for all assignments and assessments. Any such use must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. It is each student’s responsibility to assess the validity and applicability of any GAI output that is submitted; you bear the final responsibility. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Whittier College could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course.
Mixed draft policy:
Certain assignments in this course will permit or even encourage the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools such as ChatGPT. The default is that such use is disallowed unless otherwise stated. Any such use must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. It is each student’s responsibility to assess the validity and applicability of any GAI output that is submitted; you bear the final responsibility. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Whittier College could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course.
Adopted from Policies for the use of AI in Courses, Harvard University.
These statements can also be added to your Moodle course pages.
Generative AI Tools (select list)
Direct Link: Generative AI Tools
Leveraging Generative AI for Inclusive Teaching
Below are some practical considerations on using AI tools to complement or augment Whittier College’s mission on accessibility, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- Generate alt text or long descriptions for images. The generated text can then be refined or used as a starting point.
- Take notes and generate summaries of meetings or class sessions (adhering to privacy and security guidelines).
- Create representative images of challenging concepts.
- Generate outlines of lectures or course materials. Provide students with example prompts so they can do the same.
- Provide a GPT or AI assistant with upcoming lesson content (e.g., lecture materials or assignment instructions) and ask it to provide feedback (e.g., troublesome vocabulary, difficult concepts, or complementary activities) from certain perspectives. Begin with a single perspective (e.g., first-time, first-year student), but layer in more to build complexity as you interact with the GPT output.
- Use a GPT or custom AI assistant to generate alternative explanations for difficult concepts using examples or analogies that students are familiar with. In your prompt, specify the audience that will receive the explanation. For example, “Explain [concept] to [audience] using examples from a family gathering.”
- Create a space to discuss GPTs and invite students to share their perspectives, personal experiences, and concerns. Clarify your expectations about how students should use GPTs in your courses, including how to cite or acknowledge GPT use in their coursework.
- Reflect on areas where students typically struggle (e.g., using academic language, structuring their writing, and visualizing end products), and demonstrate how students can use a GPT as a collaborative, self-reflective learning assistant to help them improve their work or navigate assignments.
- Model effective AI use in your disciplines. What tools are you using and for what purposes (in English, environmental science, or civil engineering, for example)? If you use AI to be more effective in your domain, reveal these practices to your students. They are in your class to learn disciplinary skills and ways of knowing from you.
- Provide (or co-construct with your students) prompts for generative AI or generative AI searches in the same way that you might provide examples of search engine queries or library database searches for academic research.
- Demonstrate and teach expert practices in information verification, analytical questioning, and academic integrity.
Source: Educause | Read More on this Topic: Leveraging Generative AI for Inclusive Excellence in Higher Education
AI Detection Tools
There are a variety of tools that claim various degrees of success in finding instances when AI was used.
Whittier College subscribes to the plagiarism detection tool Turnitin.
However, false positives are possible therefore it is inadvisable to solely rely on AI writing detection tools.
Learn more about Turnitin’s AI writing and paraphrasing detection tools and understanding false positives.
Additional Tools and Recommendations
- Understanding Generative AI (CTL Workshop; Spring 2024)
- AI Pedagogy Project
- 7 Things You Should Know About Generative AI (Educause)
- AI is here- If we fight it, we’ll lose and so will our students! (The Ahead Journal)
- Instructors as Innovators: A future-focused approach to new AI learning opportunities with prompts by Ethan R. Mollick, Lilach Mollick (article)
- Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI by Ethan Mollick (ebook)